- 2 - Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ Federal income tax of $1,006 for the taxable year 1995. The issue for decision is whether petitioners are entitled to a deduction for alimony payments in excess of the amount allowed by respondent. Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulations of fact and the attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. Petitioners resided in Palo Alto, California, on the date the petition was filed in this case. Petitioner husband (petitioner) separated from his former wife, Laura Feriante (Ms. Feriante), in 1992. After their separation, petitioner purchased a residence in Palo Alto, California, solely in his name. Ms. Feriante and petitioner’s son, David, resided at this residence during the year in issue, 1995. Ms. Feriante eventually met Paul Kent, who moved into the Palo Alto residence and then married Ms. Feriante during 1995. The Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Santa Clara ordered petitioner in 1992 to pay Ms. Feriante monthly spousal support of $4,373 and monthly child support of $2,007. Petitioner’s marriage to Ms. Feriante subsequently was dissolved in 1993. A supplemental judgment was entered by the court in August 1995. This judgment reduced the monthly child support obligation to $1,800, stated that thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011