- 3 - informed her that she made a mistake on her return and that the Social Security benefits, as reported, were not taxable. Petitioner then explained the amounts and sources of her income for 1997, including the unemployment compensation. The IRS employee said that the refund was a final determination and it was hers to enjoy. Petitioner was uneasy with the IRS’s oral confirmation of her right to the refund in the higher amount so she called a second time to inquire about the appropriate amount of her refund. In response, another IRS employee said the IRS would send petitioner a letter regarding the taxation of Social Security benefits. After receiving the letter, petitioner called the IRS a third time and repeated that she did not receive Social Security benefits. Rather, petitioner stated, she received only unemployment compensation and she could provide the IRS written proof of its receipt. After the tax refund of $1,206 was deposited in petitioner’s bank account, petitioner did not spend the money for 7 or 8 months because she feared the IRS would ask for the money to be returned. After IRS employees repeatedly confirmed that the refund belonged to petitioner, she spent the money only when she encountered severe financial difficulties. Two years later, the IRS determined a deficiency of $720 in petitioner’s 1997 Federal income tax. The deficiency isPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011