- 8 - recapitalization 6 days later. Public shareholders received $80 cash and one share of new FMC stock for each share of old FMC stock. The cash payment made by petitioner under the revised plan, less the cash payment which it would have made under the first plan, equaled $217,649,340 (21,764,934 shares multiplied by the $10 difference between $80 and $70). Petitioner had obtained preliminary financing for the first plan with a consortium of banks, led by Morgan Guaranty. With the additional $217,649,340 in cash required for the revised plan, the banks revised the terms of the loans to impose restrictive covenants on petitioner and refused to fund the additional cash payment, so that petitioner had to raise the funds through a senior subordinated debt offering. The change in financing also led the rating agencies to downgrade petitioner’s debt. On November 14, 1986, the SEC filed a Complaint for Injunctive and Other Equitable Relief against Boesky in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged that Boesky was part of a trading scheme in which Brown, Sokolow, Levine, and others gathered material non- public information on pending business combinations or other extraordinary transactions. The complaint alleged that Levine conveyed this information to Boesky, who traded on the basis of the information knowing, or recklessly disregarding, that thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011