Harrison Dwight Foos - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         
                                             1996        1997                         
               Self-employment income        $43,603     $43,603                      
               Interest income               28             -0-                       
               DOI income                    6,343          -0-                       
               Personal exemption            (2,550)        (2,650)                   
               Itemized deductions      (4,830)    -0-                                
               Standard deduction       -0-       (3,450)                             
               Self-employment tax deduction     (3,081)    (3,081)                   
               Taxable income           39,513              34,422                    
               Income tax               8,461               6,961                     
               Self-employment tax                6,161     6,161                     
               Total tax                14,622              13,122                    
               In his petition, the sole disagreement with the notice of              
          deficiency which petitioner set forth was in the form of the                
          following statements:  “For the year 1996, I have no proof that I           
          owe $18,962.58 ($14,622.00 + $4,340.58 [interest plus additions             
          to tax])” and “For the year 1997, I have no proof that I owe                
          $17,104.55 ($13,122.00 + $3,982.55).”                                       
               At trial, petitioner filed several motions to dismiss, all             
          of which were denied.  In addition, prior to trial petitioner               
          forwarded a letter dated August 12, 1998, to the Internal Revenue           
          Service which was titled “Notice of Arbitrary and Capricious                
          Acts, Abuse of Discretion, Criminal Trespass on Private Rights,             
          and Acts in excess of Statutory Jurisdiction and Authority                  
          Limitations.”  These motions and the above-mentioned letter                 
          contain a “hodgepodge of unsupported assertions, irrelevant                 
          platitudes, and legalistic gibberish” of a type often presented             
          to this Court and which we need not address in detail again here.           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011