Estate of Augusta Porter Forbes - Page 20




                                       - 20 -                                         
          unanswered questions.  If, as respondent contends, Walter and               
          Betty never parted with their interests in their 3,296 acres, how           
          do we account for the fact that the QTIP trust held undivided               
          interests in this acreage?–-an undisputed fact upon which                   
          respondent’s determinations are in significant part predicated.             
          Moreover, if Mr. Forbes’ 2,058 acres were never transferred to              
          the limited partnership, it would appear from all the evidence              
          that this acreage passed to the QTIP trust as part of Mr. Forbes’           
          sole proprietorship and would have been sold by the QTIP trustee            
          to the general partnership as part of the August 1, 1986, sale of           
          all the sole proprietorship assets–-a sale that respondent now              
          concedes was for full and adequate consideration.9                          
               In sum, respondent’s sham argument comes too late and proves           
          too much, suggesting that at decedent’s death, the QTIP trust               
          held no interest in the subject property–-a position that even              
          petitioner has not advanced.                                                



               9 On brief, respondent suggests for the first time that the            
          QTIP trustee’s Aug. 1, 1986, sale of the sole proprietorship                
          assets excluded the sole proprietorship’s interests in growing              
          timber and pecan orchards on the Forbes land.  This position                
          appears inconsistent with respondent’s position in his notice of            
          deficiency that the Aug. 1, 1986, sale was a bargain sale from              
          the QTIP trustee to Walter and Betty of timber worth $3,887,000,            
          farm improvements worth $450,000, and farm equipment worth                  
          $145,550, and that decedent’s gross estate should be increased to           
          reflect a cause of action against the QTIP trustee for a bargain            
          sale of assets.  As previously noted, respondent has now conceded           
          that the sale was not a bargain sale and that decedent’s gross              
          estate includes no right of action against the QTIP trustee.                





Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011