- 8 - The fact that Kimberly and Michelle may not have enjoyed ideal living arrangements with Ms. Phillips during the first 8 months of the year does not mean that their principal place of abode was not with their mother. See Cubick v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1977-102. In view of the foregoing, we hold that petitioner does not qualify for head-of-household filing status in 1997. Respondent’s determination is sustained. C. Earned Income Credit In the case of an eligible individual, section 32(a) allows an earned income credit. As relevant herein, the term “eligible individual” means any individual who has a qualifying child for the taxable year.7 Sec. 32(c)(1)(A)(i). Also as relevant herein, the term “qualifying child” means a daughter of the taxpayer who has the same principal place of abode as the taxpayer for more than one-half of the taxable year. Sec. 32(c)(3)(A). The term “principal place of abode” as used in section 32(c)(3)(A) has essentially the same meaning as the term “principal place of abode” as used in section 2(b)(1)(A). Sec. 1.32-2(c)(1), Income Tax Regs. Therefore, because we have already decided that petitioner did not maintain a household that 7 An individual who does not have a qualifying child for the taxable year may nevertheless qualify as an “eligible individual”. Sec. 32(c)(1)(A)(ii). However, petitioner does not so qualify because his income exceeded the statutory maximum.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011