- 3 - a corporation that petitioner had organized several years earlier. The working relationship between petitioner, through G&A, and PSI is not entirely clear from the record, but both were involved in the following income-producing business activities during the years in issue. Petitioner, doing business as G&A, purchased surplus property or scrap items from government auctions with the intention to: (1) Resell the items intact at a profit; or (2) dismantle the items so that precious or nonprecious metals could be recovered and sold. In addition, petitioner, through G&A, also collected obsolete telecommunications equipment from private companies. This equipment was either resold for salvage or scrap, or disposed of in an environmentally sound manner. The services offered by petitioner, through G&A, were labor intensive. For example, property purchased for resale or dismantling had to be transported, typically in rented vehicles, from one location to another, as did items collected for disposition. Those items that required dismantling to recover precious and nonprecious metals were dismantled by hand. Petitioner, through G&A, had no employees during the years in issue; PSI, however, did. Accordingly, PSI provided to G&A what might be loosely referred to as contract labor services,Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011