Gary Wilson - Page 20




                                       - 20 -                                         
          disallowing any deduction for the cost of tools.                            
          3. Accuracy-Related Penalties and Addition to Tax                           
               Respondent also determined accuracy-related penalties under            
          section 6662(a) for 1992 and 1993.  Section 6662(a) imposes a 20-           
          percent penalty on underpayments attributable to negligence or              
          disregard of rules or regulations.  Sec. 6662(b)(1).                        
          “Negligence” is the failure to make a reasonable attempt to                 
          comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, or the             
          “failure to do what a reasonable and ordinarily prudent person              
          would do under the circumstances.”  Neely v. Commissioner, 85               
          T.C. 934, 947 (1985).  No accuracy-related penalty may be imposed           
          on any portion of an underpayment if it is shown that there was a           
          “reasonable cause” for such portion and that the taxpayer acted             
          in “good faith” with respect to such portion.  Sec. 6664(c)(1).             
          The determination of whether a taxpayer acted in good faith is              
          made case by case, taking into account all pertinent facts and              
          circumstances.  Sec. 1.6664-4(b), Income Tax Regs.  The most                
          important factor is the extent of the taxpayer’s efforts to                 
          determine the proper tax liability.  Id.                                    
               On brief, petitioner argues that for 1992 and 1993 he                  
          calculated his business expense deductions the same way he had              
          done for several prior years, and that he did not receive any               
          deficiency notices for those years.  Petitioner argues that his             
          reliance on respondent’s failure to take exception to his                   







Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011