Thomas F. Hale - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         

               Respondent determined a deficiency in Federal income tax of            
          $2,344 and a penalty under section 6662(a) in the amount of $469            
          with respect to petitioner's 1996 tax year.                                 
               After concessions by the parties, the issues for decision              
          are:  (1) Whether petitioner, under section 1211(b), has                    
          established his entitlement to a deduction of $3,000 as a long-             
          term capital loss, and (2) whether petitioner is liable for the             
          penalty under section 6662(a).2                                             
               Some of the facts were stipulated.  Those facts, with the              
          exhibits annexed thereto, are so found and are made part hereof             
          by reference.  At the time the petition was filed, petitioner's             
          legal residence was Pocatello, Idaho.                                       
               Petitioner was a professor of European history at Idaho                
          State University at Pocatello, Idaho.  Petitioner is also an                
          attorney and was a member of the bars of the States of Idaho and            
          Oregon.  He was admitted to practice before various courts.                 
          However, petitioner was engaged only minimally in the practice of           
          law.                                                                        



          2                                                                           
               At trial, petitioner conceded the disallowance in the notice           
          of deficiency of $3,154 of miscellaneous itemized deductions                
          relating to a payment of $5,000 by petitioner for settlement of             
          litigation that had been instituted against him by a credit                 
          union.  Additionally, at trial, the parties reached a basis of              
          settlement in connection with $8,840 in rental expenses claimed             
          by petitioner on Schedule E, Supplemental Income and Loss, of his           
          1996 return.                                                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011