Ridge L. Harlan and Marjory C. Harlan - Page 24




                                       - 24 -                                         
                         (2) In determining the applicability of the 6-year           
                    period of limitation on assessment and collection                 
                    provided in section 6501(e) (relating to omissions of             
                    more than 25 percent of gross income), a partner’s                
                    gross income includes his distributive share of                   
                    partnership gross income (as described in section                 
                    6501(e)(1)(A)(i)).  In this respect, the amount of                
                    partnership gross income from which was derived the               
                    partner’s distributive share of any item of partnership           
                    income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit (as included             
                    or disclosed in the partner’s return) is considered as            
                    an amount of gross income stated in the partner’s                 
                    return for the purposes of section 6501(e).  For                  
                    example, A, who is entitled to one-fourth of the                  
                    profits of the ABCD partnership, which has $10,000                
                    gross income and $2,000 taxable income, reports only              
                    $300 as his distributive share of partnership profits.            
                    A should have shown $500 as his distributive share of             
                    profits, which amount was derived from $2,500 of                  
                    partnership gross income. However, since A included               
                    only $300 on his return without explaining in the                 
                    return the difference of $200, he is regarded as having           
                    stated in his return only $1,500 ($300/$500 of $2,500)            
                    as gross income from the partnership.                             
               In providing for an extended limitations period, the                   
          Congress did not indicate why gross income, rather than adjusted            
          gross income or any other concept, was chosen as the touchstone             
          for the extended statute of limitations,9 nor did the Congress              
          provide a clue as to what is meant by “the return” for purposes             
          of determining the amount of the denominator in the 25-percent              
          calculation.  Compare Colony, Inc. v. Commissioner, 357 U.S. 28             
          (1958), in which the Supreme Court relied on legislative history            
          to decide what is meant by “omits from gross income” for purposes           


               9Note that a taxpayer’s omission of gross income does not              
          necessarily result in an adjustment to the taxpayer’s taxable               
          income.  See Colony, Inc. v. Commissioner, 357 U.S. 28, 36                  
          (1958); Colestock v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 380 (1994).                     





Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011