James E. Hendricks and Roberta J. Hendricks - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a)(1)1 and (d)(1)               
          for substantial understatement of tax.                                      
               Following concessions,2 we must decide the following issues:           
               1.  Whether $69,500 that James E. Hendricks (petitioner)               
          withdrew from his individual retirement account (IRA) is taxable            
          to petitioners in 1996.  We hold that it is.                                
               2.  Whether petitioners are liable for the accuracy-related            
          penalty under section 6662(a) and (d) for substantial                       
          understatement of tax.  We hold that they are.                              
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          A.   Petitioners                                                            
               Petitioners are married and lived in Laurinburg, North                 
          Carolina, when they filed the petition in this case.                        
          B.   Bechtel Trust & Thrift Plan                                            
               Petitioner worked for Bechtel Corp. (Bechtel) from 1977 to             
          1988, when he resigned, and from 1992 until 1995, when he                   
          retired.  He became a participant in the Bechtel Trust & Thrift             


               1  Unless otherwise stated, section references are to the              
          Internal Revenue Code in effect in 1996, and Rule references are            
          to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.                           
               Sec. 6662(a)(1) did not exist in 1996.  We assume that                 
          respondent meant to cite sec. 6662(a).                                      
               2  Petitioners concede that their 1996 income should be                
          increased by $500 for unemployment compensation and by $11 for              
          interest income.                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011