John R. Hernandez - Page 9




                                        - 8 -                                         
          section 61(a)(4).  Also, it has long been established that income           
          includes “undeniable accessions to wealth, clearly realized, and            
          over which the taxpayers have complete dominion.”  Commissioner             
          v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426, 431 (1955).                            
               As in Hernandez I, petitioner has failed to bring a single             
          witness to the courtroom to corroborate his story.  Moreover,               
          petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the amounts received              
          from the redemption of the tax certificates were paid to the                
          copayees.  Petitioner has also failed to introduce any evidence             
          that shows that the copayees included any of these amounts on               
          their Federal income tax returns.  Furthermore, petitioner                  
          deposited these amounts in his own bank account.  Based upon                
          these facts, we conclude that petitioner exercised dominion and             
          control over the interest income he received from the redemption            
          of the tax certificates.                                                    
               For the foregoing reasons, and following our recent opinion            
          in Hernandez I involving the same taxpayer and closely similar              
          circumstances, we sustain in its entirety respondent’s adjustment           
          to petitioner’s income for 1994.                                            
               Section 6662(a) imposes a penalty of 20 percent of the                 
          portion of the underpayment that is attributable to negligence or           
          disregard of rules or regulations.  See sec. 6662(b)(1).                    
          Negligence is the lack of due care or failure to do what a                  
          reasonable and ordinarily prudent person would do under the                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011