- 8 - from her parents, as opposed to the $2,502 allowed by respondent. Petitioner produced what appears to be a financial spreadsheet pertaining to her parents which reflects total distributions to or for the benefit of petitioner during 1992 of $3,002.07. Of the $500.07 of such expenditures which respondent determined did not warrant a reduction from gross receipts, $323.07 was paid to third parties on petitioner’s behalf. As those amounts were not deposited to petitioner’s checking accounts, they do not support a reduction from the gross receipts figure determined by respondent. The remaining $177 in dispute consists of a purported distribution of $27 to petitioner on October 19, 1992, as well as a purported $150 distribution to petitioner on November 26, 1992. Petitioner, however, failed to establish that these amounts were deposited to her checking accounts. Accordingly, petitioner is not entitled to a reduction from gross receipts by reason of nontaxable transfers from her parents in excess of the $2,502 allowed by respondent. Third, petitioner contends that the reduction from gross receipts on account of interaccount transfers should be $10,735.54 as opposed to the $8,775.54 reduction allowed by respondent for such purpose. Petitioner introduced into evidence bank statements indicating that $10,035.54 in transfers were madePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011