Thaddeus D. Hollingsworth - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         

               The children lived with Ms. Smith in a 1-bedroom apartment             
          in 1995 and then a 2-bedroom apartment with Ms. Smith and her               
          mother in 1996 and 1997.  Although Ms. Smith had full custody of            
          the children, there is scant evidence in the record as to her               
          employment history during the years in issue.  Ms. Smith received           
          public benefits during some months throughout the years in issue.           
               In 1995, petitioner worked as a janitor and part-time bus              
          driver.  In 1996 and 1997, petitioner worked full-time as a                 
          janitor for Dependable Building Maintenance.  Petitioner lived in           
          the basement of his brother’s 4-bedroom home during 1995.  During           
          the weekends and summer months, the children also lived with                
          petitioner in his brother’s home.  Petitioner paid $300 per month           
          in rent.  In 1996 and 1997, petitioner moved into a 2-bedroom               
          apartment near Ms. Smith.  Petitioner paid for the children’s               
          meals, school clothing, and some additional child support.  When            
          the children stayed with him, he would diminish his own expenses            
          in order to care for the children’s needs.                                  
               In petitioner’s respective 1995, 1996, and 1997 Federal                
          income tax returns, he claimed dependency exemptions for his                
          minor children, head of household filing status, and earned                 
          income credits.  For each year, respondent disallowed the                   
          dependency exemption because petitioner failed to establish that            
          he was entitled to the exemption.  As a result of the                       
          disallowance, respondent further determined that petitioner’s               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011