- 7 - any weight. Petitioner mentioned many individuals as participants in his efforts, but none of these people testified. Accordingly, we find that petitioner has failed to substantiate his claimed traveling expenses. Petitioner also failed to establish the amount or business purpose of the claimed telephone expenses. At trial, petitioner attempted to substantiate the claimed telephone expenses by presenting copies of telephone bills. Contrary to petitioner’s argument, these telephone bills do not establish the business purpose for the telephone expenses. The bills could represent personal calls as easily as they could business calls. Petitioner attempted to substantiate the claimed car and truck expenses and meals and entertainment expenses by introducing a mileage log and a diary. Contrary to petitioner’s assertions, the mileage log and diary do not substantiate these expenses. At trial, petitioner testified that the diary represented expenses paid by his brother, who died in India prior to trial. Petitioner also testified that the mileage log represented car and truck expenses incurred by his brother. Petitioner also stated that most of the entries in the log had been made by his brother’s driver in India. The business function of the travel has not been established. Petitioner’s brother was a practicing physician in India, and the record does not show whether the expenses he allegedly paid were for his medical practice, were personal, or were for some aspect of thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011