Marsha K. Huggins - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $1,363 in                        
          petitioner’s Federal income tax for taxable year 1997.  The sole            
          issue for decision is whether petitioner is entitled to exclude             
          from income, the payments she received from a former spouse                 
          incident to a divorce proceeding.                                           
               This case was submitted fully stipulated without trial under           
          Rule 122.  The accompanying exhibits are incorporated herein by             
          reference.                                                                  
                                     Background                                       
               Petitioner resided in Astoria, Oregon, at the time her                 
          petition was filed in this case.                                            
               Petitioner's marital relationship with her former husband              
          was dissolved by a decree of dissolution of marriage (decree) by            
          the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon, the final and effective           
          date of which was January 18, 1986.  The decree includes a                  
          provision providing that her former husband will pay to her "a              
          sum of money equaling one-half of monthly net amount, after                 
          deductions for federal and state taxes, of the U.S. Coast Guard             
          retirement pension received by [petitioner's former husband].               
          Payment to [petitioner] shall not be included as taxable income             
          to [petitioner], nor shall such payments be deductible by                   
          [petitioner's husband]."  The decree directs that the payments be           
          made directly to petitioner and continue until the mortgage on              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011