Fred F. Humble - Page 6




                                        - 5 -                                         

          Taxpayers must substantiate by adequate records certain items in            
          order to claim deductions, such as the amount and place of each             
          separate expenditure, the property’s business and total usage,              
          the date of the expenditure or use, and the business purpose for            
          an expenditure or use.  Sec. 274(d); sec. 1.274-5T(b), Temporary            
          Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46014 (Nov. 6, 1985).  To                    
          substantiate a deduction by means of adequate records, a taxpayer           
          must maintain an account, book, diary, log, statement of expense,           
          trip sheets, and/or other documentary evidence, which, in                   
          combination, are sufficient to establish each element of                    
          expenditure or use.  Sec. 1.274-5T(c)(2)(i), Temporary Income Tax           
          Regs., 50 Fed Reg. 46017 (Nov. 6 1985).  Travel, and car and                
          truck expenses cannot be estimated under Cohan.  Sanford v.                 
          Commissioner, 50 T.C. 823, 827-828 (1968), affd. per curiam 412             
          F.2d 201 (2d Cir. 1969).                                                    
               Petitioner did not have any books or records.  He did not              
          have a diary, log, or trip sheets relating to his travel.                   
          Petitioner did not satisfy the strict requirements of section 274           
          with respect to his travel.  At trial, petitioner had little                
          evidence to support many of his claimed deductions.  He provided            
          some substantiation of medical and other expenses.                          
               In addition, there is no credible evidence in the record               
          which supports the contention that petitioner performed services            
          for persons other than his three employers.  The only indication            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011