- 15 - disclose the relevant facts of that treatment, we uphold respondent on this issue. The third issue for decision is whether this Court has jurisdiction to review the section 6621(c) tax-motivated interest assessed by respondent. Section 6621(c), formerly section 6621(d)--as in effect for taxable years for which returns were due prior to 1990, for interest accruing after 1984--provides an increased rate of interest for substantial underpayments attributable to tax-motivated transactions. This Court generally lacks jurisdiction to redetermine interest prior to an entry of a decision redetermining a deficiency. See sec. 7481(c) (as currently in effect); Rule 261; Pen Coal Corp. v. Commissioner, 107 T.C. 249, 255 (1996). Furthermore, this Court generally does not have jurisdiction to review respondent’s assessment of section 6621(c) tax-motivated interest in affected item proceedings, such as in the present case, even though the tax- motivated interest is an affected item which requires a partner level determination. See White v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 209 (1990); Greene v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-105. A narrow exception to this rule applies if a taxpayer has paid the assessed tax-motivated interest and subsequently invokes the overpayment jurisdiction of this Court under section 6512(b). See Barton v. Commissioner, 97 T.C. 548 (1991).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011