- 31 -
Whether Petitioner Satisfies The Community Benefit Test
The community benefit test requires consideration of a
variety of factors that indicate whether an organization is
involved in the promotion of health on a community-wide basis.
See Sound Health Association v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. at 181-185
(comparing Sound Health Association’s operations with “hospital
A” in Rev. Rul. 69-545, 1969-2 C.B. 117.) Considering all the
facts and circumstances surrounding petitioner’s operations, even
though petitioner is instrumental in arranging for the provision
of health care to a large number of individuals in the geographic
area that it serves, we are not persuaded that petitioner
provides a meaningful community benefit. Accordingly, petitioner
does not qualify for tax-exempt status as an organization
described in section 501(c)(3) based upon the provision of a
community benefit.
Significantly, unlike the HMOs in Geisinger Health Plans v.
Commissioner, supra, and Sound Health Association v.
Commissioner, supra, petitioner did not offer its health plans to
the general public. Petitioner only offered its IHC Care health
plan to employees of large employers; i.e., employers with more
than 100 employees. Moreover, petitioner no longer offers its
IHC Senior Care plan to Medicare patients. In sum, petitioner
Page: Previous 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011