- 4 - one had explained how he could owe the amounts sought by respondent. At that hearing, petitioner did not otherwise contest the underlying tax liability or accept any of the payment options proposed by respondent. Respondent determined that petitioner’s wages should be levied in a notice of determination concerning collection actions under section 6330 sent on July 8, 1999. In response, petitioner filed the petition in this case. OPINION A. The Notice of Lien Petitioner contends that he is entitled to relief under section 6320 from the notice of lien. We disagree. Section 6320 was first effective January 19, 1999. See Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-206, sec. 3401(d), 112 Stat. 685, 750. Thus, section 6320 does not apply to the notice of Federal tax lien issued on September 3, 1996. B. Underlying Tax Liability Respondent did not send a notice of deficiency to petitioner for 1985, 1986, 1987, 1994, or 1995, but respondent did send a notice of deficiency for 1992. Respondent does not contend that petitioner may not raise issues relating to 1992 in this case, in part because it is not clear whether petitioner received that notice of deficiency. Thus, petitioner may challenge thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011