- 28 - Dondi/ Date THEI Manchester Total 12-31-91 $2,092,861 $15,794,195 $17,887,056 12-31-90 minus 1,231,959 15,096,796 16,328,755 Increase 860,902 697,399 11,558,301 1 These figures do not take into account a dispute over an adjustment in IHCL’s ordinary income for 1991 of $16,402, an issue which we address infra p. 41. Respondent concludes that, because a deemed liquidation would produce the above results, its allocation of all the net income to THEI after June 20, 1991, reflects the partners’ interests in the partnership. The Issue Revisited The contrast between respondent’s and petitioner’s theories of the comparative liquidations arises from petitioner’s contention that a deemed liquidation of IHCL must also involve a deemed liquidation of Landmark and Gateway and the resulting minimum gain chargebacks. In our initial examination of this issue, we agreed with respondent. In Interhotel I, we held that IHCL, as a minority owner of Landmark and Gateway, lacked the legal capacity to force Landmark and Gateway to dispose of the property that generated the nonrecourse deductions. Accordingly, upon liquidation, IHCL could only dispose of its partnership interests in Landmark and Gateway. Those partnerships, however, would continue to own the hotel properties. In the absence of some other event that triggered minimum gain chargebacks (such as a repayment of the principal ofPage: Previous 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011