- 27 - relation to that date, the evidence suggests the following. First, the record indicates that the Ishizakis’ divorce settlement was not final even as of the time of trial in March of 2001. Mrs. Ishizaki testified “we not finalize our divorce situation yet, such as asset and debts, we haven’t finalized”, and she cited an upcoming May court appearance. The record also contains a schedule of assets and debts filed as part of the divorce proceedings which is dated March 15, 1999, further showing that formalities were in fact ongoing at least several months into the 1999 year. Second, there is a complete absence of any documentary evidence or testimony that would raise the inference of a legal separation, much less the date thereof. Third, the record likewise fails to establish with any degree of certainty that petitioner and Mrs. Ishizaki were not members of the same household at any time throughout the 1-year period preceding June 22, 1999. Mrs. Ishizaki mentioned that she had moved frequently during the pending divorce, but offered no timeframes or dates. Petitioner stated that separation was filed for on February 14, 1997, and alluded to a temporary apartment in late 1996, but he, too, was silent with respect to the critical time period. We therefore simply are not in a position to guess whether petitioner and Mrs. Ishizaki might havePage: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011