Edward D. and Donna L. Johns - Page 7




                                        - 6 -                                         

               Under the Florida Constitution, Florida residents are                  
          provided with a homestead exemption.  Fla. Const. art. 10, sec. 4           
          (West 1965).  Under this exemption, in general, the debtor's                
          residence and the debtor's personal property to the value of                
          $1,000 are exempt from creditors.  Id.  The Florida Statutes also           
          provide exemptions for annuities and certain pension, retirement,           
          and profit-sharing plans.  Fla. Stat. Ann. secs. 222.14, 222.21             
          (West 1998).  A debtor's interest, not to exceed $1,000 in value,           
          in a single motor vehicle is also exempt from creditors.  Fla.              
          Stat. Ann. sec. 222.25 (West 1998).  Therefore, under Florida               
          law, petitioners' creditors would not be able to attach                     
          petitioners' home, $1,000 of the automobile, $1,000 of personal             
          property, the interests in the FPL Thrift Plan and the MetLife              
          annuity, and the potential interests in the FPL pension and the             
          Florida Retirement System.                                                  
               Even so, for purposes of section 108(a)(1)(B) and (d)(3),              
          petitioners cannot exclude from their assets the property exempt            
          under Florida law.  This Court recently held that property exempt           
          from creditors under State law may not be excluded from "assets"            
          when making an insolvency determination under section                       
          108(a)(1)(B) and (d)(3).  Carlson v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 87              
          (2001).                                                                     
               As set forth above, on each of the three dates on which                
          petitioners’ debts were discharged, petitioners’ assets exceeded            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011