John Ralph Johnson - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         
          Normac, Inc. v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 142, 147 (1988).  A                   
          petition for redetermination of a deficiency must be filed with             
          this Court within 90 days (or 150 days if the notice is addressed           
          to a person outside the United States) after the notice of                  
          deficiency is mailed to the taxpayer.  See sec. 6213(a).  The               
          time in which a petition must be filed is jurisdictional and                
          cannot be extended.  Failure to file within the prescribed period           
          requires that the case be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.               
          See Estate of Cerrito v. Commissioner, 73 T.C. 896, 898 (1980);             
          Stone v. Commissioner, 73 T.C. 617, 618 (1980).                             
               Here, the 90-day period for filing a timely petition under             
          section 6213(a) expired on Thursday, January 22, 1998, which date           
          was not a legal holiday in the District of Columbia.  The                   
          petition was mailed to the Court on December 29, 2000, a date               
          which is 1,162 days after the mailing of the notices.  Although             
          petitioner may not have actually received the notices of                    
          deficiency until October 22, 2000, a fact that he asserts but               
          that we do not find, the statutory 90-day period begins to run              
          where, as here, respondent mails the notices to petitioner’s last           
          known address; i.e., the address shown on his most recently filed           
          return.  See King v. Commissioner, 857 F.2d 676, 679 (9th Cir.              
          1988), affg. 88 T.C. 1042 (1987); Abeles v. Commissioner, 91 T.C.           
          1019, 1035 (1988).  In this regard, respondent’s records reveal             
          that petitioner’s 1992 Federal income tax return was the return             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011