- 4 - Section 1.152-4(b), Income Tax Regs., provides that custody will be determined by the terms of the most recent decree of divorce * * *. * * * [I]f * * * a decree * * * [does not establish] who has custody, * * * “custody” will be deemed to be with the parent who, as between both parents, has the physical custody of the child for the greater portion of the calendar year. While section 152(e)(2) provides that a custodial parent under section 152(e)(1) may agree that the noncustodial parent may claim a dependency exemption, the requirements of that exception are not satisfied here. Respondent focuses on the original divorce decree that provided that the primary physical residence for the children would be with the former wife. But, as far as this record is concerned, that decree was not the most recent court action with respect to the custody issue as it related to all the children. In January 1993, the court recognized that one of the children (Candace) was living with petitioner and approved that arrangement. We realize that there may have been other custodial arrangements during the years that would render the January 1993, court order stale, but, by the same token, such arrangements would also render the original divorce decree stale. On the other hand, if we conclude that the decree does not establish which parent had custody, it seems quite apparent from the testimonies of petitioner and his former wife that petitioner had physical custody of one of the children for the greater portionPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011