- 6 -
THE COURT: The respondent has asked for
universities and colleges attended. Have you been able
to provide that information?
MS. IZEN: I suppose that we could supplement that
with the names of the universities.
THE COURT: Respondent has asked for that
information, the areas of study and degrees awarded.
Have you provided that information?
MS. IZEN: I don’t see the specific names of the
university. It says she had two years of college, and
it does say colleges attended. So we could get the
name of that.
THE COURT: I would direct that within two weeks
you provide that supplemental information to
respondent.
Are there other specific aspects of Interrogatory
No. 38 that you feel have not been satisfied,
Ms. Chirich?
MS. CHIRICH: No. We were just curious about
whether she had training in accounting. She either
does or doesn’t. It’s not specific enough on her
resume to let us know what kind of training she has had
to do the job she is doing for this company that we
think is selling the trusts. We don’t know whether she
is a sales person in that company. That is why we are
looking to see what her duties are. Or whether she
merely just types letters and envelopes or whether she
actually promotes and gives seminars herself on these
trusts.
MS. IZEN: Your Honor, I respectfully submit that
that really doesn’t get to the basics of this lady’s
tax stuff. The types of questions that they are asking
appear to be for other reasons. What they did was took
her information and they disallowed all of her business
expenses. The issue of whether or not she should have
gone into a trust is totally separate from
substantiating her business deductions. The way they
phrased that, that they want to know whether she had
accounting experience, doesn’t have anything to do with
the issue.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011