Estate of Frank Johnson - Page 93




                                       - 21 -                                         
          boxes.  Respondent seized property from Larry’s home on June 15,            
          1994, and from Katherine’s home on June 17, 1994.  Larry and                
          Nancy filed an administrative protest on July 15, 1994, in which            
          they requested abatement of the jeopardy assessment.  Respondent            
          abated the jeopardy assessment on or about November 18, 1994, but           
          imposed an equitable lien on Larry’s real property.                         
               On August 12, 1994, respondent mailed a notice of deficiency           
          to Larry and Nancy for the years 1983 through 1990.  Respondent             
          determined the deficiencies set forth in that notice of                     
          deficiency on the basis of a source and application of funds                
          analysis for each of those years.  On November 14, 1994, Larry              
          and Nancy filed a petition with the Tax Court seeking a                     
          redetermination of those deficiencies (docket No. 20854-94).                
          Respondent, Larry, and Nancy subsequently settled docket No.                
          20854-94.  The decision document, entered February 20, 1996,                
          reflected, among other things, that (1) no deficiencies in tax              
          were due for the years 1983 through 1988, (2) no additions to tax           
          were due for the years 1983 through 1988, (3) deficiencies in tax           
          were due for years 1989 and 1990 in the amounts of $7,140 and               
          $6,606, respectively,12 (4) additions to tax were due for years             

               12  In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined tax             
          deficiencies for 1989 and 1990 of $13,317 and $16,461,                      
          respectively.  Those deficiencies were calculated on the basis of           
          the following adjustments to income:                                        

                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011