- 2 - MEMORANDUM OPINION NIMS, Judge: This matter is before the Court on petitioners’ motions, filed pursuant to Rule 75, to compel taking of the deposition of Hussein Darwish. Unless otherwise indicated, all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, and all section references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code. Background The facts stated herein are as represented in papers submitted in connection with the parties’ discovery efforts, and are taken as true solely for the purpose of deciding petitioners’ motions. The petitioners in these consolidated cases are an individual, Khaled Ahmed, and a corporation solely owned by Mr. Ahmed, K & M La Botica Pharmacy, Inc. (La Botica). Mr. Ahmed is a licensed pharmacist in the State of California. Throughout the years at issue, La Botica was engaged in the business of operating pharmacies which sold prescription and over-the-counter medications and treatments. Mr. Ahmed is also alleged to have been involved in the operation of medical service clinics and a medical laboratory through various nominee entities. At some time prior to March of 1999, respondent began an examination regarding the income taxes of Mr. Ahmed and the related La Botica corporation. Thereafter, on March 11, 1999,Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011