Don E. Kramer - Page 13




                                       - 12 -                                         
               On the basis of the complete record, we hold that BERM did             
          not distribute its assets to petitioner during 1994; therefore,             
          petitioner is not entitled to deduct the operational or                     
          abandonment losses claimed on his Schedule C.  Accordingly,                 
          respondent is sustained on this issue.                                      
          Section 6662(a)                                                             
               The last issue for decision is whether petitioner is liable            
          for an accuracy-related penalty pursuant to section 6662(a).                
          Section 6662(a) imposes a penalty of 20 percent of the portion of           
          the underpayment which is attributable to negligence or disregard           
          of rules or regulations.  See sec. 6662(b)(1).  Negligence is the           
          “‘lack of due care or failure to do what a reasonable and                   
          ordinarily prudent person would do under the circumstances.’”               
          Neely v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 934, 947 (1985) (quoting Marcello            
          v. Commissioner, 380 F.2d 499, 506 (5th Cir. 1967), affg. 43 T.C.           



               6(...continued)                                                        
          Tax Return, BERM was insolvent at the close of 1994.  However,              
          BERM’s Form 1120X, Amended U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return,              
          reports an adjustment of $102,533, as “Management Fees Received”            
          in 1994, thus transforming BERM into a solvent corporation at the           
          close of 1994.  At trial, petitioner testified that he did not              
          invest $102,533, but rather, he relieved the corporation of                 
          $102,533 in loans he had previously made to the corporation in              
          1994.  The record does not indicate any evidence of the amount of           
          loans petitioner made to BERM other than petitioner’s testimony             
          and the amended return.  Also, the record contains no management            
          agreements which petitioner testified required him to indemnify             
          the corporation for any loss at the end of the year.  On the                
          basis of the above, we do not accept petitioner’s self-serving              
          testimony in the absence of corroborating evidence.  See                    
          Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202, 212 (1992).                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011