- 3 - assignments of error committed by respondent in determining the deficiencies and additions in dispute and the facts on which he based the assignments of error. Because petitioner filed amended petitions that alleged, among other things, assignments of error and facts that can be interpreted as raising justiciable issues, respondent's motions were denied. At trial, however, petitioner raised only one issue. That issue can be distilled to a peculiar concept, often espoused by tax protesters. He did not have income in the years at issue, he said, because the corporate payroll checks he received were debts, "And when you take that check to the bank, you get more debts that are called" Federal reserve notes. Petitioner admitted that he received the checks from various payers and that he failed to file Federal income tax returns and pay taxes. During the years at issue, petitioner was an insurance salesman working on a commission basis for a number of insurance companies. Before trial, petitioner refused to stipulate any facts or exhibits. Respondent was forced to bring in from various locations representatives from insurance companies to testify concerning documents verifying their commission payments to petitioner. Petitioner failed to question on cross- examination any witness or raise an objection to the admission of any of the documents they produced.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011