Seymour and Beatrice Leffert - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
               In August, 1988 we were first notified of a proposed                   
               disallowance of Blue Gem.  We are requesting an                        
               abatement of interest from December, 1988 to present                   
               for the following reasons:                                             
               Our 1988 Appeal from the proposed disallowance was                     
               taken to the Tax Court and it took eight years for the                 
               overburdened court, after putting it on the docket, to                 
               issue a 1996 decision.[7]                                              
               The decision was issued in favor of the government’s                   
               position since the TMP of Blue Gem was uncooperative.                  
               In that ensuing eight year period we heard nothing from                
               the Internal Revenue Service and had no idea of this                   
               inordinate length it would take to reach a decision.                   
               Had we known, we surely would have deposited the tax                   
               liability in 1988 to stop the running of interest.                     
               We are in dispute as to the timely assessment of                       
               interest due to the inordinate delay of eight years and                
               we respectfully request an abatement from December 31,                 
               1988.  We have no way of calculating the interest due                  
               to December 31, 1988 and have therefore left Item 2                    
               [i.e., the amount of interest to be abated] blank.                     
               Surely the Internal Revenue Service should not penalize                
               a taxpayer for an eight year Tax Court delay in                        
               rendering a decision.  It would seem that this case                    
               would fall under the term “Ministerial Act”.                           
                         *    *    *    *    *    *    *                              
               Had we not appealed the IRS decision we would have paid                
               the tax and interest to December 31, 1988.  Because we                 
               appealed we are being penalized for an eight year delay                


               7Contrary to petitioners’ explanation, neither the TMP nor             
          any notice partner filed a petition in this Court for                       
          redetermination of the partnership adjustments proposed in the              
          FPAA’s issued with respect to Blue Gem.  In fact, the Blue Gem              
          case was “defaulted” administratively because a timely judicial             
          proceeding was not filed in any court following the mailing of              
          the FPAA’s.  We also note that petitioners’ claim that they                 
          “heard nothing from the Internal Revenue Service” during an 8-              
          year period was not accurate, as our findings of fact reflect.              





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011