- 17 - unsupported, self-serving testimony to be credible. Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, supra; Tokarski v. Commissioner, supra. Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to a deduction for the storage unit. 9. Repairs Petitioner deducted $431 for repairs and maintenance. Respondent conceded that petitioner is entitled to deduct $110. The repairs relate to petitioner’s printer. Petitioner substantiated $270.31 for repairs, and he is entitled to a deduction in that amount. One of the repair receipts relates to “Clickart Company” software. The record does not indicate how this software is related to petitioner’s trade or business. Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to a deduction for the software.4 10. Supplies Petitioner deducted $306 for supplies. At trial, petitioner testified as follows: “Office supplies would have been fax paper, basically the--maybe the toner for the fax machine. Things like that.” Petitioner did not provide documents or other evidence regarding supplies. Petitioner failed to provide the Court with evidence sufficient to establish a rational basis upon which an estimate can be made. We sustain respondent’s determination. 4 Even if the software related to petitioner’s trade or business, he would not be entitled to a current deduction for the full amount. Secs. 167(f)(1), 197(d).Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011