- 6 - OPINION Respondent determined that the advances and guaranty payments were capital contributions to JTFJ, entitling petitioners to a short term capital loss deduction in 1989, and a short-term capital loss carryover deduction of $3,000 per year in 1991, 1992, and 1994. Petitioners contend that they are entitled to a section 166 business bad debt deduction of $445,104 in 1991. In the alternative, petitioners contend that they are entitled to deduct these payments as section 165 losses, or as section 162(a) ordinary and necessary business expenses. I. The Joint Venture Petitioners contend that they are entitled to an ordinary deduction because the advances to JTFJ and guaranty payments were made pursuant to a joint venture. Petitioners further contend that the entity became worthless in 1991. A joint venture has been defined as a special combination of two or more persons, where in some specific venture a profit is jointly sought without any actual partnership or corporate designation. See Beck Chem. Equip. Corp. v. Commissioner, 27 T.C. 840, 848 (1957). Whether an entity will be recognized as a joint venture for tax purposes is determined by reference to the same principles that govern recognition of a partnership. See Luna v. Commissioner, 42 T.C. 1067, 1077 (1964) (stating that thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011