Limited Gaming of America, Inc. - Page 6




                                                - 6 -                                                  
            $352,466.93.  After a hearing on the motion, the Bankruptcy Court                          
            ruled in its Memorandum Opinion filed October 1, 1997:                                     
                        The Motion is granted in part and denied in part.                              
                  The Withdrawn Claim will be reinstated as to the                                     
                  corporate income taxes of LGA in its original amount of                              
                  $5,000.00.  The IRS will not be allowed to amend the                                 
                  claim to reflect the increase which it seeks, nor will                               
                  the IRS be allowed to file a completely new claim out                                
                  of time for either the 1993 or 1994 income taxes of                                  
                  LGA.                                                                                 
                                    Discussion                                                         
                  Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, answers                           
            to interrogatories, depositions, admissions, and any other                                 
            acceptable materials, together with the affidavits, if any, show                           
            that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a                          
            decision may be rendered as a matter of law.”  Rule 121(b);                                
            Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 518, 520 (1992), affd.                           
            17 F.3d 965 (7th Cir. 1994); Naftel v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527,                          
            529 (1985).  Summary judgment is intended to expedite litigation                           
            and avoid unnecessary and expensive trials.  See Fla. Peach Corp.                          
            v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 678, 681 (1988); Espinoza v.                                      
            Commissioner, 78 T.C. 412, 415-416 (1982).  The moving party                               
            bears the burden of proving that there is no genuine issue of                              
            material fact, and factual inferences will be made in a manner                             
            most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment.  See                                
            Dahlstrom v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 812, 821 (1985).                                        
            Petitioner’s Contentions:                                                                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011