Guadalupe Mares - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          taxpayer’s parents and siblings “over half of whose support, for            
          the calendar year * * * was received from the taxpayer”.  Sec.              
          152(a)(3)and (4).  “The term ‘support’ includes food, shelter,              
          clothing, medical and dental care, education, and the like.”                
          Sec. 1.152-1(a)(2)(i), Income Tax Regs.                                     
               During 1996, petitioner generously contributed towards the             
          support of the household of which she was a member.  She paid               
          some of the utilities, bought food, and purchased clothing for              
          her family members.  Nevertheless, taking into account the modest           
          amount of her income, the amount of the Federal income tax refund           
          she received in 1996, the amount of the mortgage payments made              
          by her father, and the amount of public assistance petitioner’s             
          mother received on behalf of herself and her children, we                   
          are not convinced from petitioner’s generalized testimony that              
          she contributed over one-half of the support for any of the                 
          individuals to whom the dependency exemption deductions here in             
          dispute relate.  Consequently, petitioner is not entitled to a              
          dependency exemption deduction for any of her siblings or her               
          mother, and respondent’s determinations in this regard are                  
          sustained.                                                                  
          2. Filing Status                                                            
               Petitioner filed her 1996 return as a head of household.               
          Under the circumstances, because petitioner is not entitled to              
          a dependency exemption deduction for any of her siblings or her             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011