- 13 -
ticket purchases were for business purposes which
serves as irrefutable evidence to the court for which
the court can only decide the issue in petitioner’s
favor.
* * * * * * *
(3) What were the tickets purchased for.
RESPONSE: Same objection as for (i)(1).
(j) For the amount for Games Unique:
(1) Provide a list of the names or type of
the software purchased and state the quantity for each
one named.
RESPONSE: Objection. Vague. Ambiguous.
Grossly multifarious. Overbroad. Burdensome.
Impossible to answer based on the way the interrogatory
is stated. Notwithstanding objection, Petitioner only
offers the sufficient factual sworn testimony that all
software purchases were for business purposes which
serves as irrefutable evidence to the court for which
the court can only decide the issue in petitioner’s
favor.
Section 6662
The description of petitioner’s claims and his testimony
also support the accuracy-related penalty of section 6662.
Petitioner failed to make a reasonable attempt to comply with the
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. See sec. 6662(c). He
did not rely reasonably on his preparer. Petitioner and his
preparer testified that certain types of expenses were deducted
under several headings on the tax return. Paul testified:
But the important issue here is that postage on the
general ledger had documented checks and backup support
for the $6,966 except for the fact that some of those
items may not have been postage.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011