Brandon Christopher Merriweather - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          of the matter (in the form of an Appeals Office hearing) and, if            
          dissatisfied, with judicial review of the administrative                    
          determination in either the Tax Court or a Federal District                 
          Court.                                                                      
          Section 6330(c)(2)(B) provides that neither the existence                   
          nor the amount of the underlying tax liability can be contested             
          at an Appeals Office hearing unless the taxpayer did not receive            
          a notice of deficiency for the tax in question or did not                   
          otherwise have an earlier opportunity to dispute such tax                   
          liability.  Section 6330(d)(1)(A) provides that a taxpayer may              
          file a petition for review of the Commissioner's administrative             
          determination with the Tax Court so long as the Court has                   
          jurisdiction over the underlying tax liability.                             
               In Goza v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 176 (2000), we explained             
          that section 6330(c) provides for an Appeals Office hearing to              
          address collection issues such as spousal defenses, the                     
          appropriateness of the Commissioner's intended collection action,           
          and possible alternative means of collection.  We further                   
          explained that section 6330(c)(2)(B) provides that neither the              
          existence nor the amount of the underlying tax liability can be             
          contested at an Appeals Office hearing unless the taxpayer did              
          not receive a notice of deficiency for the tax in question or did           
          not otherwise have an earlier opportunity to dispute such tax               
          liability.  The taxpayer in Goza had received a notice of                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011