Metrocorp, Inc. - Page 65




                                       - 65 -                                         
          Central Tex. Sav. & Loan Association v. United States, 731 F.2d             
          1181, 1183 (5th Cir. 1984)); Wells Fargo & Co. & Subs. v.                   
          Commissioner, supra at 883-884 (a separate and distinct capital             
          asset always provides long-term benefits).  Therefore,                      
          respondent’s broader assertion of long-term benefits necessarily            
          included the narrower assertion that the fees were part of                  
          Metrobank’s cost of acquiring capital assets.1                              
               More importantly, the stipulated record establishes that the           
          fees were paid in connection with Metrobank’s asset acquisition.            
          We should therefore consider the factual, causal, and legal                 
          consequences of that relationship, even if respondent didn’t                
          expressly raise it as an issue, and even though the case at hand            
          was submitted fully stipulated under Rule 122.  In Ware v.                  
          Commissioner, 92 T.C. 1267 (1989), the taxpayer asserted that we            
          should reconsider a case submitted under Rule 122 because the               
          Commissioner allegedly had relied on a theory raised for the                
          first time on brief.  We denied the taxpayer’s motion, and noted            
          that under appropriate circumstances we can rest our decision for           
          the Commissioner on reasons neither set forth in the notice of              
          deficiency nor relied upon by the Commissioner.  See Ware v.                
          Commissioner, supra at 1269, and cases cited therein; Bair v.               


               1 See majority op. p. 18, which states that “Expenses must             
          generally be capitalized when they either: (1) Create or enhance            
          a separate and distinct asset or (2) otherwise generate                     
          significant [long-term] benefits”.  (Emphasis added.)                       





Page:  Previous  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011