- 13 - v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-563; Moran v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-412; Fredrickson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-125. The Tax Court has also invariably held that recipients of settlement proceeds from the State Farm class action lawsuit are required to include the proceeds in gross income. See, e.g., Westmiller v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-140; Reiher v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-75; Easter v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-8; Brewer v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-542, affd. without published opinion 172 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 1999); Gillette v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-301; Hayes v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-213; Hardin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-202; Raney v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-200; Clark v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-156; Berst v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-137; Martinez v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-126, affd. without published opinion 83 AFTR 2d 99-362, 99-1 USTC par. 50,168 (9th Cir. 1998); Fredrickson v. Commissioner, supra. Approximately 3 months after the Supreme Court’s opinion in Schleier, respondent mailed petitioner the 30-day letter of September 28, 1995, which proposed that the proceeds of her settlement of the State Farm class action lawsuit be included in her gross income. Thereafter, petitioner signed a series of consents extending the period of limitations on assessment for the 1992 tax year; in due course, in 1998, respondent issued the notice, which embodies respondent’s determination to give effectPage: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011