- 41 - deduction to the extent his contributions were from investment income. This was because the investment income was not derived from personal services. In so ruling, we quoted the legislative history of section 401(c), which states: “Since the objective of * * * [a qualified plan for the self-employed] is to provide retirement benefits based on personal services, inactive owners who derive their income entirely from investments would not be allowed to participate.” S. Rept. 992, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. 12 (1961), 1962-3 C.B. 303, 314; see also Frick v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1985-542, affd. without published opinion 808 F.2d 837 (7th Cir. 1986); Frick v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-86, affd. without published opinion 916 F.2d 715 (7th Cir. 1990). In the case at hand, petitioner applied to become a State Farm trainee agent in fall 1976 or January 1977. However, petitioner never performed any services for State Farm, either as employee or as independent contractor. After 1977, she never worked in the insurance industry, although from time to time thereafter she worked in various selling jobs, sometimes as employee and sometimes as independent contractor. As in the Kramer and Frick cases, the income paid by State Farm to petitioner in the case at hand cannot be earned income because itPage: Previous 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011