Austin L. Mitchell and Rebecca A. Mitchell - Page 15




                                       - 15 -                                         
          wealthy, did not enter farming activity with intent to produce              
          paper losses to offset nonfarm income).  This factor is neutral.            
               9.   Elements of Personal Pleasure                                     
               The presence of recreational or personal motives in                    
          conducting an activity may indicate that the taxpayer is not                
          conducting the activity for profit.  Sec. 1.183-2(b)(9), Income             
          Tax Regs.                                                                   
               Petitioner mended fences, cut underbrush, dug weeds, and               
          planted trees.  Respondent contends that petitioner planted trees           
          to beautify the farm.  Petitioners' residence is located on their           
          farm, and they have not shown that their farm expenditures did              
          not benefit their residence and their enjoyment of their                    
          property.  See Estate of Dickerson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.              
          1997-165 (Christmas tree farm activity not conducted for profit;            
          trees provided personal pleasure because they were located near             
          taxpayers’ residence).                                                      
               Petitioner enjoyed working on the farm.  This fact does not            
          mean that he did not engage in the activity for profit.  The farm           
          had no recreational facilities, and petitioner worked hard on the           
          farm.  However, it is unclear how much of his work on the farm              
          had any economic purpose.  This factor is neutral.                          
               10. Conclusion                                                         
               We conclude that petitioner did not operate the farm for               
          profit in 1995, 1996, and 1997 because he did nothing to generate           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011