Barry L. Moore - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
               On April 22, 1992, respondent mailed to petitioner a notice            
          of deficiency determining a deficiency of $15,494 in petitioner’s           
          Federal income tax for 1989 and additions to tax under sections             
          6651(a)(1) and 6654(a).  Respondent mailed the notice to                    
          petitioner at the N. Central address.                                       
               By letter dated June 1, 1992, petitioner wrote to respondent           
          acknowledging receipt of the above-described notice of deficiency           
          and again citing the UCC for the proposition that “the Notice of            
          Deficiency, dated April 22, 1992, a presentment on your behalf,             
          is dishonored.”  Petitioner failed to file a petition with the              
          Court challenging the notice of deficiency for 1989.                        
                    2.  1990 Through 1992                                             
               On February 2, 1995, respondent issued to petitioner (at the           
          N. Central address) a so-called 30-day letter with respect to               
          petitioner’s tax liabilities for 1990 through 1992.                         
               By letter dated February 17, 1995, John B. Kotmair, Jr. (Mr.           
          Kotmair) of Westminster, Maryland, wrote to respondent                      
          challenging petitioner’s tax liability for the taxable years 1990           
          through 1992.2  Mr. Kotmair’s letter listed petitioner’s address            
          as #43 Richardson Heights Village, Richardson, Texas 75080 (the             
          Richardson Heights address).  Mr. Kotmair’s letter included as an           
          attachment a copy of the above-described 30-day letter dated                

               2 The gist of Mr. Kotmair’s letter was that respondent                 
          lacked authority to examine the taxable years 1990 through 1992             
          because petitioner did not file income tax returns for those                
          years.                                                                      




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011