Patricia M. Mora, F.K.A. Patricia Rasberry - Page 18




                                       - 18 -                                         
          return for 1985 showed wages of $30,203 and Shorthorn partnership           
          losses of $20,180 and for 1986 showed wages of $36,943 and                  
          Shorthorn partnership losses of $26,234.  A reasonably prudent              
          taxpayer would have questioned deductions of this size in                   
          relation to their income.  “Tax returns setting forth large                 
          deductions, such as tax shelter losses offsetting income from               
          other sources and substantially reducing or eliminating the                 
          couple's tax liability, generally put a taxpayer on notice that             
          there may be an understatement of tax liability.”  Hayman v.                
          Commissioner, 992 F.2d 1256, 1262 (2d Cir. 1993), affg. T.C.                
          Memo. 1992-228.                                                             
               Unlike the situation in Price v. Commissioner, 887 F.2d 959            
          (9th Cir. 1989), where the requesting spouse questioned the                 
          deduction and received assurances regarding the propriety of the            
          deduction, petitioner failed to make inquiries.  The court in               
          Price distinguished cases, like the one at hand, where “a spouse            
          seeking relief * * * simply ignored a large deduction and * * *             
          refused to make inquiries.”  Id. at 966; see also Reser v.                  
          Commissioner, 112 F.3d 1258, 1267-1268 (5th Cir. 1997) (“Tax                
          returns setting forth ‘dramatic deductions’ will generally put a            
          reasonable taxpayer on notice that further investigation  is                
          warranted.  A spouse who has a duty to inquire but fails to do so           
          may be charged with constructive knowledge of the substantial               
          understatement and thus precluded from obtaining innocent spouse            






Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011