John Mosier and Sarah Spain - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         
          income tax refund of $494 is includable in their gross income in            
          1995.2                                                                      
               Other concessions were made or modified outside the                    
          stipulation.  The first concerns the interest expense deducted by           
          petitioners with respect to their writing/lecturing business.               
          Petitioners deducted interest expenses for this business in the             
          amounts of $5,342, $6,845, and $11,303, for 1993, 1994, and 1995.           
          Of these amounts, respondent disallowed (i.e., made adjustments             
          of) $1,417, $4,256, and $10,206.  In his trial memorandum,                  
          respondent concedes that the notice of deficiency should have               
          allowed as deductions expenses of $3,878, $2,774, and $1,061 for            
          the years 1993, 1994, and 1995, respectively.  Respondent made              
          conflicting statements at trial, stating that the adjustments in            
          the notice of deficiency should be reduced by the amounts of                
          (rather than result in allowances of) $3,878, $2,774, and $1,061            
          for the years in issue, respectively.  Because it is clear from             
          the record that respondent’s counsel misspoke at trial, we accept           
          the trial memorandum’s version as respondent’s concession.                  
          However, we will disregard the conceded amounts in 1993 and 1995            
          because these amounts actually decrease the amount of allowable             


          2The stipulation also contained a purported concession in                   
          respondent’s favor concerning petitioners’ travel/writing/                  
          consulting business.  The concession names “other interest”, an             
          expense not at issue in this case with respect to that business.            
          Although we assume the parties meant to refer to travel expenses,           
          which are at issue, we do not need to resolve the ambiguity in              
          this concession due to our holding on the issue in this case.               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011