- 10 - petitioner5 deducted on her 1985 and 1986 Federal income tax returns, respectively. On July 16, 1999, respondent issued a notice of deficiency to petitioners for 1982 and 1983 in which he determined that petitioners are liable for additions to tax for negligence pursuant to section 6653(a)(1) and (2) for 1982 and 1983 in connection with our decision entered against Jojoba. On July 2, 1999, respondent issued a notice of deficiency to petitioner for 1985 and 1986 in which he determined that petitioner is liable for additions to tax for negligence pursuant to section 6653(a)(1) and (2) for 1985 and pursuant to section 6653(a)(1)(A) and (B) for 1986 in connection with our decision entered against Jojoba. Discussion I. Consistent Settlement Offer The first issue we must decide is whether respondent is required to enter into a consistent settlement agreement with petitioners under section 6224. We address this issue assuming, but not deciding, that the issue is properly before the Court. Petitioners contend that respondent is obligated to offer them terms of settlement consistent with settlement agreements entered 5Mr. Myers died in 1984. In late 1984, petitioner attended a class in Federal income tax at Hawaii Pacific College. In 1988 and 1989, petitioner completed classes in basic and intermediate income tax preparation at H&R Block.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011