Brian and Tina Nicklaus - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          Washington, and First National Bank in Libby, Montana.3                     
               On July 16, 1999, respondent filed notices of Federal tax              
          lien with respect to petitioners’ taxable years 1993 through 1996           
          (July 16, 1999 notices of Federal tax lien) and notified peti-              
          tioners of their right to an Appeals Office hearing.  Petitioners           
          requested such a hearing.  In their request for an Appeals Office           
          hearing, petitioners did not refer to the notices of intent to              
          levy with respect to their taxable years 1993 through 1995 that             
          they had received from respondent sometime prior to November 25,            
          1998, or to the notices of levy with respect to those years that            
          respondent issued to two banks on that date.  At the Appeals                
          Office hearing regarding the July 16, 1999 notices of Federal tax           
          lien, respondent’s Appeals officer did not raise any questions              
          regarding those notices of intent to levy or those notices of               
          levy.                                                                       


               3Sec. 6330, which generally provides that the Secretary may            
          not proceed with the collection of taxes by way of levy until the           
          taxpayer has been given notice and an opportunity for administra-           
          tive review of the matter in the form of an Appeals Office                  
          hearing, was enacted as part of the Internal Revenue Service                
          Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (RRA 1998), Pub. L. 105-206,           
          sec. 3401, 112 Stat. 685, 746.  Sec. 6330 is effective with                 
          respect to collection actions initiated more than 180 days after            
          July 22, 1998, i.e., after Jan. 18, 1999.  See RRA 1998, sec.               
          3401(d), 112 Stat. 750.  Sec. 6330 did not require respondent to            
          offer petitioners an opportunity for an Appeals Office hearing              
          regarding the levy with respect to petitioners’ taxable years               
          1993 through 1995 referred to above.  That is because it was                
          prior to the effective date of sec. 6330 that respondent notified           
          petitioners of respondent’s intent to levy with respect to their            
          taxable years 1993 through 1995 and issued notices of levy to two           
          banks with respect to those years.                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011