- 8 -
Anderson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-607, affd. 62 F.3d 1266
(10th Cir. 1995).
Negligence is defined as the failure to exercise the due
care that a reasonable and ordinarily prudent person would
exercise under like circumstances. See Anderson v. Commissioner,
62 F.3d 1266, 1271 (10th Cir. 1995), affg. T.C. Memo. 1993-607;
Neely v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 934, 947 (1985); Glassley v.
Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-206. The focus of inquiry is
on the reasonableness of the taxpayer’s actions in light of his
experience and the nature of the investment. See Henry Schwartz
Corp. v. Commissioner, 60 T.C. 728, 740 (1973); Greene v.
Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-101, affd. without published
opinion 187 F.3d 629 (4th Cir. 1999); Glassley v. Commissioner,
supra; Turner v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-363. Whether a
taxpayer is negligent in claiming a tax deduction "depends upon
both the legitimacy of the underlying investment, and due care in
the claiming of the deduction." Sacks v. Commissioner, 82 F.3d.
918, 920 (9th Cir. 1996), affg. T.C. Memo. 1994-217; see Greene
v. Commissioner, supra.
A taxpayer may avoid liability for negligence penalties
under some circumstances if the taxpayer reasonably relied on
competent professional advice. See Freytag v. Commissioner, 89
T.C. 849, 888 (1987), affd. 904 F.2d 1011 (5th Cir. 1990), affd.
on other issue 501 U.S. 868 (1991). Such reliance, however, is
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011