- 2 - motion on the ground that the petition was not filed by a proper party under Rule 60(c).2 Background On February 5, 2001, respondent mailed a notice of deficiency for the taxable years 1994 and 1995 to “Northstate Tax Consultants Trust”. On May 7, 2001, a petition in the name of “Northstate Tax Consultants” was timely filed. The petition was signed by Mark E. Kent (Mr. Kent). The notice of deficiency and the petition both listed the same address in Redding, California, as petitioner’s address. On July 26, 2001, respondent moved, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 60(c), to dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the petition was not filed by a trustee authorized under California law to bring suit on behalf of Northstate Tax Consultants Trust (NTCT). In his motion, respondent alleges that a Form 1041, U.S. Fiduciary Income Tax Return, was filed with respondent in the name of “Northstate Tax Consultants” for each of the taxable years 1994 and 1995. Respondent contends that, before issuing the notice of deficiency, he requested that copies of certain trust documents be provided to him in order to establish the identity of the trustees authorized to act on behalf of NTCT. Respondent 2All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011