Thomas and Linda O'Connell - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
          nonbusiness bad debt.  Respondent further contends that the                 
          additional expenses in dispute were not substantiated as to                 
          amount or business purpose and that petitioners’ negligence in              
          reporting items on their returns and in understating their tax              
          liabilities supports the additions to tax and penalties                     
          determined by respondent.                                                   
               Petitioner contends that the advances from his insurance-              
          related entities were bona fide loans; that the fishing                     
          activities were a charter business; and that the loan guaranty              
          was intended to protect petitioners’ salaries from Mayflower.               
          Petitioners presented neither evidence nor argument relating to             
          the remaining deductions or the additions to tax and penalties.             
          Thus, petitioners are deemed to have abandoned those issues.  In            
          any event, deductions cannot be allowed in the absence of                   
          evidence that shows the expenses were incurred and the purpose              
          for which they were incurred.  The concessions by petitioners as            
          to mischaracterized and improper deductions support the additions           
          to tax and penalties in each year.                                          
               With respect to the other issues, petitioner testified at              
          trial.  His testimony was not corroborated by any other witnesses           
          and was, to some extent, contradicted by the documentary                    
          evidence.  We need not accept uncontroverted testimony at face              
          value if it is improbable, unreasonable, or questionable, see,              
          e.g., Lovell & Hart, Inc. v. Commissioner, 456 F.2d 145, 148 (6th           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011