- 6 - this contention. Petitioner has not attempted to controvert the admissions he made, under penalties of perjury, on each application that he filed shortly after the end of each year in issue. Indeed, these contemporaneous applications seem more reliable than petitioner’s Federal income tax returns (which were filed years after the fact), especially given that petitioner has admitted that he kept no books or records and has stipulated that he does not know how he arrived at the gross receipts reported on his tax returns. Therefore, we sustain respondent’s determination of the amount of petitioner’s unreported income. Wage Expense Deductions Petitioner offered no evidence to substantiate the wage expense deductions he claimed on his Federal income tax returns. Accordingly, petitioner has not established that he is entitled to wage expense deductions greater than those allowed by respondent.4 Additions to Tax Pursuant to Section 6651(f) Respondent has determined that petitioner is liable for section 6651(f) additions to tax for fraudulently failing to file his tax returns for each of the subject years. Respondent must establish by clear and convincing evidence that petitioner’s 4 For 1992, respondent determined that petitioner is entitled to wage expense deductions greater than petitioner claimed on his 1992 Federal income tax return. This determination is not in issue.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011